ChuukVotes.org Chuuk State unofficial results
2027 General Election
Flag of Chuuk State2019 Chuuk State Election Results
Unofficial — not certified
Last publishedMay 25, 2026, 2:44 PM ChST

District 2 2 seats

House of Representatives — District 2

Tonoas & Etten

4,473 candidate votes
16 of 18 reporting89%
Top 2 currently in seat rangeRanked by total votes · Provisional
  1. 1Innocente (Sipach) OneisomSeat range1,62436.3%
  2. 2Hadley (Ampon) FrancisSeat range1,44232.2%
  3. 3John Soyon1,40731.5%
Final-seat margin: 35 votes. Hadley (Ampon) Francis leads John Soyon. Jump to voting places
Jump to places

Area ledger

Results by voting place

16 of 18 places shown
Places shown
Candidates in listed order
Leading here · current 2-seat rangeTie at final seatHighlights are provisional.

Scroll within the table to compare all places. Candidate headings and place names stay visible. Expand for more room.

Candidate votes by municipality and voting place. All municipalities · Reporting only. Candidates are in listed order.
Municipality / voting placeHadley (Ampon) FrancisVotes / shareInnocente (Sipach) OneisomVotes / shareJohn SoyonVotes / shareTotal
Tonoas16 of 18 reporting · 16 shown
Etten221 candidate votes4620.8%11752.9%Leading here5826.2%Leading here221
Enin Penienuk177 candidate votes7240.7%Leading here6838.4%Leading here3720.9%177
Kuchuwa742 candidate votes41756.2%Leading here19526.3%Leading here13017.5%742
Nechap418 candidate votes9121.8%Leading here6515.6%26262.7%Leading here418
Nukuno551 candidate votes19735.8%Leading here22540.8%Leading here12923.4%551
Pwene-Chuun261 candidate votes6826.1%7629.1%Leading here11744.8%Leading here261
Roro/Safei/Sangku568 candidate votes10318.1%Leading here36564.3%Leading here10017.6%568
Tonoas VAAPP Weno53 candidate votes1732.1%Leading here2343.4%Leading here1324.5%53
Tonoas VAAPP Portland86 candidate votes2124.4%2427.9%Leading here4147.7%Leading here86
Tonoas VAAPP Honolulu607 candidate votes13422.1%18430.3%Leading here28947.6%Leading here607
Tonoas VAAPP Guam659 candidate votes21833.1%Leading here24036.4%Leading here20130.5%659
Tonoas VAAPP Hilo39 candidate votes1743.6%Leading here820.5%1435.9%Leading here39
Tonoas VAAPP Saipan60 candidate votes2033.3%Leading here2541.7%Leading here1525.0%60
Tonoas VAAPP Pohnpei0 candidate votes0000
Tonoas VAAPP Travelers17 candidate votes847.1%Leading here847.1%Leading here15.9%17
Tonoas VAAPP Mail-in Votes14 candidate votes1392.9%Leading here17.1%Leading here00.0%14
Tonoas subtotal16 displayed places1,44232.2%Leading here1,62436.3%Leading here1,40731.5%4,473

Tonoas

16 of 18 reporting · 16 shown

4,473 votes shown

Etten

221 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) Francis4620.8%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here11752.9%
  3. John SoyonLeading here5826.2%

Enin Penienuk

177 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here7240.7%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here6838.4%
  3. John Soyon3720.9%

Kuchuwa

742 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here41756.2%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here19526.3%
  3. John Soyon13017.5%

Nechap

418 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here9121.8%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) Oneisom6515.6%
  3. John SoyonLeading here26262.7%

Nukuno

551 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here19735.8%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here22540.8%
  3. John Soyon12923.4%

Pwene-Chuun

261 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) Francis6826.1%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here7629.1%
  3. John SoyonLeading here11744.8%

Roro/Safei/Sangku

568 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here10318.1%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here36564.3%
  3. John Soyon10017.6%

Tonoas VAAPP Weno

53 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here1732.1%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here2343.4%
  3. John Soyon1324.5%

Tonoas VAAPP Portland

86 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) Francis2124.4%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here2427.9%
  3. John SoyonLeading here4147.7%

Tonoas VAAPP Honolulu

607 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) Francis13422.1%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here18430.3%
  3. John SoyonLeading here28947.6%

Tonoas VAAPP Guam

659 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here21833.1%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here24036.4%
  3. John Soyon20130.5%

Tonoas VAAPP Hilo

39 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here1743.6%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) Oneisom820.5%
  3. John SoyonLeading here1435.9%

Tonoas VAAPP Saipan

60 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here2033.3%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here2541.7%
  3. John Soyon1525.0%

Tonoas VAAPP Pohnpei

0 candidate votes

Reported · 0 votes
  1. Hadley (Ampon) Francis0
  2. Innocente (Sipach) Oneisom0
  3. John Soyon0

Tonoas VAAPP Travelers

17 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here847.1%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here847.1%
  3. John Soyon15.9%

Tonoas VAAPP Mail-in Votes

14 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here1392.9%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here17.1%
  3. John Soyon00.0%

Tonoas subtotal

4,473 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Hadley (Ampon) FrancisLeading here1,44232.2%
  2. Innocente (Sipach) OneisomLeading here1,62436.3%
  3. John Soyon1,40731.5%

Latest returns

Showing 3 of 8 latest reportsView all updates →
TonoasTonoas VAAPP Mail-in Votes

+1414 votes now shown

TonoasTonoas VAAPP Travelers

+1717 votes now shown

TonoasTonoas VAAPP Pohnpei

00 votes now shown

How these results are calculated

Totals sum published voting-place returns. Percentages are shares of all candidate votes, not shares of voters; voters may choose more than one candidate in a multi-seat race. Reporting progress counts a place after its first published return, including a zero-vote return. Municipality subtotals sum the displayed places; active search filters are clearly marked. Green means the current leading or seat-range candidates; amber marks only a tie at the final-seat boundary. A tie within the seat range is not a cutoff tie. Area standings do not declare a winner unless the race is certified.

Full methodology and flag credits →